Canadian poaching

COMMERCIAL FISHING OFFENCES LEAD TO $8,000 IN FINES AND A TEN-YEAR BAN


THUNDER BAY, ON - June 16, 2008 - Two Thunder Bay men have been fined $8,000 for commercial fishing offences, with one man receiving a ten-year ban from participating in the commercial fishing industry.
Daniel Sameluk, 34, pleaded guilty to two over-quota charges and was fined $4,000.

Jarvis Sameluk, 64, was convicted in court of two over-quota charges and was fined $4,000. He also received a ban from any involvement in the commercial fishing industry for the next 10 years. The commercial fishing ban was imposed as a result of a range of convictions over more than 25 years.
Commercial fishing licence holders are responsible for taking the appropriate steps to ensure that they do not exceed their quota. The over quota fish seized by the ministry were sold for more than $3,800 which was redirected to the Special Purpose Account for funding fish and wildlife work across the province.

Justice of the Peace John Guthrie heard the case in the Ontario Court of Justice, Thunder Bay, on November 29-30, 2006, and March 10-12, 2007. On June 24, 2008, the Justice of the Peace John Guthrie rejected the abuse of process application and convicted Jarvis Sameluk on both counts

Think he would have learned from past fines over the last 25 years.

"The commercial fishing ban was imposed as a result of a range of convictions over more than 25 years."

Maybe not, if he was doing it for so long. Some people just don't care.:burn:

DUNCAN, BC, Aug. 14 /CNW/ - As a result of an investigation carried out by Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO), a Sidney, B.C. resident has been fined $3,500 for two counts of contravening the Fisheries Act. Mr. Xi Chang Gao was convicted on April 8, 2008, in Duncan Provincial Court, of disturbing marine mammals, contrary to section 78 of the Fisheries Act and Regulations, and failing to comply with the conditions of his commercial crab fishing licence.

$3,000 of the fine was applied for disturbing marine mammals; the remaining $500 was for the crab fishing licence violation. On August 25, 2007, a DFO fishery officer received a complaint that the vessel Vien Duong was observed travelling at full speed through a pod of killer whales (Orcas), in Boundary Passage near South Pender Island, B.C., where the Southern resident killer whale population is listed as endangered under the Species at Risk Act.

After interviewing several witnesses and reviewing a video of the incident, a fishery officer charged Mr. Gao, owner of the Vien Duong. The video indicated that the Vien Duong appeared to collide, or very nearly collide, with a killer whale while continuing to maneuver around other members of the pod at full speed and in close proximity. Further, upon review of the vessel's logbook, it was determined that in August 2007, Mr. Gao failed to maintain an up-to-date logbook, contrary to the conditions of his commercial crab fishing licence.

That's a pretty steep fine for almost running over some whales. Were any of them hurt or injured? Almost seems like someone had an agenda and wanted to bust him on something. Violations should be prosecuted, but reading that story didn't seem like he did much damage.

Maybe you have a point, but where do we draw the line? When are exceptions made, and how do you justify one over the other?