Christie administration will create artificial reef for recreational fishing

DEP PLAN TO BALANCE ACCESS TO REEFS

(13/P25) TRENTON - The Christie Administration has developed a compromise between
recreational and commercial fishing interests regarding access to artificial reefs off
the coast of New Jersey, Department of Environmental Protection Commissioner (DEP) Bob
Martin announced today.

The plan will allow commercial interests to have continued access to portions of two
reefs in state waters and calls for the construction of a new reef exclusively for
recreational fishing, also in state waters.

"The Christie Administration recognizes that recreational and commercial fishing are
each vital to New Jersey's economy," Commissioner Martin said. "The commercial
and recreational saltwater fishing industries provide enormous benefits to New Jersey,
generating combined revenues of about $2.5 billion per year. We are confident that this
compromise will address the needs of commercial fishermen and recreational anglers, and
will result in restoration of federal funding that is vital to a program that provides
tremendous benefits to our state."

The DEP's Division of Fish and Wildlife holds permits for 15 artificial reef sites - 13
in federal waters and two in state waters. The reefs, encompassing a total of 25 square
miles of ocean floor, are constructed from a variety of materials, such as rocks,
concrete and steel, even old ships and barges. These materials provide surfaces for a
wide diversity of marine organisms to grow, ultimately providing food and shelter for
fish.

Under the DEP's plan, commercial fishermen will be permitted to continue using portions
of two existing reefs in state waters off Sandy Hook and Manasquan. State waters extend
from the shoreline to three miles offshore. Recreational fishermen will continue to have
access to all portions of these reefs.

In addition, a new reef, encompassing about a square mile of ocean floor, will be
constructed in state waters in an area north of Barnegat Inlet to be used exclusively for
recreational fishing. The Division of Fish and Wildlife will apply for a DEP Division of
Land Use Regulation permit and will seek to amend a U.S. Army Corps of Engineers permit
for this project.

This new reef will encompass roughly the same area as the portions of existing state
waters reefs that commercial fishermen will be allowed to use. The new reef will take one
to two years to design and build and two to five years to become fully productive.

"I thank the Christie Administration, Commissioner Martin and legislators for
understanding the importance of resolving fixed gear conflicts on reefs in state and
federal waters, and for their commitment to take action,'' said Anthony Mauro, Chairman
of the New Jersey Outdoor Alliance, an organization representing recreational fishing
groups. "Commissioner Martin's pledge is a giant step towards resolving gear
conflicts, and addresses many concerns expressed by recreational anglers. Though the
restoration of federal funding to the New Jersey Reef Program is requisite for a final
resolution, we are very encouraged by the prospect of an equitable conclusion to what has
long been an obstinate problem.''

The plan is expected to resolve federal concerns that commercial fishing is intruding on
and hampering recreational fishing on artificial reefs in state waters, which are funded
by excise taxes on recreational fishing gear and motor boat fuel. Costs to obtain, clean
and deploy suitable material also is supported by private donations.

As the plan is implemented, the DEP will petition the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to
restore nearly $250,000 in annual funding for artificial reef research, improvements and
maintenance that has been withheld as a result of this issue.

Funding restored by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service would be used to pay for a portion
of this project. Donations from both the commercial and recreational fishing communities
could also help pay for construction. The DEP, in consultation with stakeholders and the
Army Corps of Engineers, will finalize a site for the new reef, which is expected to cost
about $200,000 to design and build.

Under the plan, the DEP will petition the federal Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council
for Special Management Zone designation which would allow the DEP to prohibit commercial
gear on all 13 existing artificial reefs in federal waters. The Mid-Atlantic Fishery
Management Council has sole authority over reefs in federal waters.

Artificial reefs are extremely popular with anglers and divers, contributing to the
state's economy through the creation of tourism opportunities and jobs. New Jersey's
commercial fishing industry ranks 7th in the nation in retail sales, and supports $327
million in salaries and wages and nearly 13,000 jobs

Recreational saltwater fishing brings in more than $640 million in retail sales and is
directly responsible for nearly 10,000 jobs and more than $242 million in tax revenues,
including $165 million in state and local taxes.

For more information on New Jersey's Artificial Reef Program, visit: http://www.nj.gov/dep/fgw/artreef.htm

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by njdiver

This new reef will encompass roughly the same area as the portions of existing state
waters reefs that commercial fishermen will be allowed to use. The new reef will take one
to two years to design and build and two to five years to become fully productive.

For more information on New Jersey's Artificial Reef Program, visit: http://www.nj.gov/dep/fgw/artreef.htm

---

What happened to the old reefs why can't we use them? Wasn't something going on with them in the courts? sorry if this is a stupid question.

Because Bill Figley who headed up the reef program and is now retired from the state did not exclude them when he wrote the reef bill so they are sort of grandfathered. There gear is around the reef not on it. Plus only 2 reefs are in NJ state waters the rest are in Federal waters. Drifting down the side of there gear produces some nice fluke, the weekend warriors do most of the complaining.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by finchaser

Because Bill Figley who headed up the reef program and is now retired from the state did not exclude them when he wrote the reef bill so they are sort of grandfathered.

---

Mr. Figley had nothing to do with a decision to restrict gear types when the reef program began. His superiors, up to and including the NJDEP Commissioner at that time, were the ones to make that decision.

I stand corrected I was always told he drafted the original bill.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by njdiver

Mr. Figley had nothing to do with a decision to restrict gear types when the reef program began. His superiors, up to and including the NJDEP Commissioner at that time, were the ones to make that decision.

---

Thanks for reporting this. I was trying to figure it out when I first read it. It looks to me like we recreational fishermen got the shaft and once again commerial interests won. it is going to take at least 2 years for the reefs they are talking about building to be worthwhile to fish. So what's your take on this. Did we get screwed or not? thanks

It remains to be seen. As there is yet to be a proposed regulation published no one knows what it will specifically contain. There are two hoops this proposed regulation must get through. The NJ Marine Fisheries Council and the Sport Fish Restoration Program.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by njdiver

. The NJ Marine Fisheries Council

---

Any ideas why the mfc would hold this up njdiver?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by captnemo

Any ideas why the mfc would hold this up njdiver?

---

Composition

The council consists of eleven members appointed by the Governor, with the consent of the Senate. The makeup of the council is set by statute and is composed of four sports fishermen, two active commercial fin fishermen, one active fish processor, two members of the general public, and the chairman of the two sections of the Shellfisheries Council.

http://www.nj.gov/dep/fgw/councils.htm#marine


5 Commercial

4 Recreational

2 Public at large (one of which has been unfilled since 2005)