Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: Federal agencies battle over fish

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    1,486

    Default Federal agencies battle over fish

    Federal agencies battle over fish

    By MICHAEL HAWTHORNE
    Chicago Tribune
    Article Last Updated: 12/18/2008 01:44:30 AM PST


    In the waning days of the Bush presidency, the Food and Drug Administration is pushing to scuttle the government's advice about mercury-contaminated seafood, a dramatic policy change that would, in effect, encourage women and children to eat more fish despite growing concerns about the toxic metal. The FDA's recommendations, sent recently to the White House Office of Management and Budget for approval, prompted a sharp rebuke from scientists at the Environmental Protection Agency who, in memos circulated earlier this month, described them as "scientifically flawed and inadequate."



    A joint advisory issued by the two agencies in 2004 cautions women of childbearing age, nursing mothers and young children to limit seafood consumption to 12 ounces a week. But in a draft version of the FDA's new report, the agency says its own modeling shows that kids can benefit from eating more fish, not less.
    The FDA argues that nutrients in fish offset the risks posed by mercury and could boost a child's IQ by three points. Its conclusion is similar to claims by the seafood industry.
    EPA scientists, though, say the FDA's report reaches conclusions that aren't supported by the studies it cites, and at various points either trivializes or overstates existing research.
    Moreover, the EPA scientists say, the FDA fails to consider that some species of fish tend to have much higher mercury levels than others. The EPA's comments reflect long-standing criticism that the government isn't


    giving Americans enough advice about which types of seafood are safest to eat.

    The FDA's proposal is among a series of controversial policy changes moving quickly as the Bush administration prepares to leave office. Seafood industry lobbyists want to scale back the government's mercury warning, which they contend is depressing sales and scaring women away from eating fish.
    In contrast, President-elect Barack Obama and leaders of the Democratic-controlled Congress have pledged to enforce tougher mercury policies.



    "Once again, the Bush administration seems intent on ignoring sound science on mercury poisoning," said Sen. Patrick Leahy, D-Vt.. "This backroom bouquet for special interests should be stopped in its tracks."
    The Environmental Working Group, an advocacy organization that obtained the FDA report, sent a letter to EPA Administrator Stephen Johnson urging him to fight the proposal.
    In an e-mail response to questions, the FDA said a final decision had not been reached.



    Studies have shown that exposure to mercury in the womb, mostly from fish eaten by mothers, can irreversibly damage the brain before birth, causing subtle delays in walking and talking as well as decreased attention span and memory. Some research suggests that mercury also could increase the risk of heart disease in adults.
    Sniping between the FDA and EPA is nothing new. The two agencies have fought for years about how to caution women and children about mercury.




    A 2005 Tribune investigation found that the government's advisory doesn't reflect its own testing about mercury levels in fish. Supermarkets routinely sell mercury-contaminated fish, in part because the federal government doesn't inspect seafood for mercury before it is sold, the newspaper found.



    The government's advisory tells pregnant women, young children and other at-risk groups to not eat shark, swordfish, king mackerel and tilefish because of high mercury levels. It also cautions those groups to limit their overall fish consumption to 12 ounces a week, including no more than 6 ounces of canned albacore tuna.
    Yet the government doesn't require warnings at supermarkets. And the advisory says nothing about other commonly sold fish that contain even more mercury than albacore, including grouper, orange roughy, Chilean sea bass and marlin.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Ct
    Posts
    800

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by surferman View Post
    Federal agencies battle over fish

    By MICHAEL HAWTHORNE
    Chicago Tribune
    Article Last Updated: 12/18/2008 01:44:30 AM PST


    In the waning days of the Bush presidency, the Food and Drug Administration is pushing to scuttle the government's advice about mercury-contaminated seafood, a dramatic policy change that would, in effect, encourage women and children to eat more fish despite growing concerns about the toxic metal. The FDA's recommendations, sent recently to the White House Office of Management and Budget for approval, prompted a sharp rebuke from scientists at the Environmental Protection Agency who, in memos circulated earlier this month, described them as "scientifically flawed and inadequate."



    The FDA argues that nutrients in fish offset the risks posed by mercury and could boost a child's IQ by three points. Its conclusion is similar to claims by the seafood industry.
    EPA scientists, though, say the FDA's report reaches conclusions that aren't supported by the studies it cites, and at various points either trivializes or overstates existing research.
    Moreover, the EPA scientists say, the FDA fails to consider that some species of fish tend to have much higher mercury levels than others. The EPA's comments reflect long-standing criticism that the government isn't giving Americans enough advice about which types of seafood are safest to eat.

    I guess paying lobbyists to further your cause really does pay off.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •