Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: HR 1584 - What it is and why it's important?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    NJ
    Posts
    12,822

    Default HR 1584 - What it is and why it's important?

    H.R. 1584:
    Flexibility in Rebuilding American Fisheries Act of 2009
    111th Congress This is a bill in the U.S. Congress originating in the House of Representatives ("H.R."). A bill must be passed by both the House and Senate and then be signed by the President before it becomes law.
    Bill numbers restart from 1 every two years. Each two-year cycle is called a session of Congress. This bill was created in the 111th Congress, in 2009-2010.
    The titles of bills are written by the bill's sponsor and are a part of the legislation itself. GovTrack does not editorialize bill summaries.

    2009-2010

    Navigation
    > Overview
    - Summary (CRS)
    - Full Text
    - Committee Assignments
    - Related Legislation

    Track H.R. 1584
    This feed includes all major activity on this bill and its amendments, references in the Congressional Record, and relevant upcoming committee meetings.


    Primary Source
    See H.R. 1584 on THOMAS for the official source of information on this bill or resolution.


    To amend the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act to extend the authorized time period for rebuilding of certain overfished fisheries, and for other purposes.
    Overview

    Sponsor:
    Rep. Frank Pallone [D-NJ6]show cosponsors (25)
    Cosponsors:
    Donna Christensen [D-VI]
    John Adler [D-NJ3]
    Robert Andrews [D-NJ1]
    Gus Bilirakis [R-FL9]
    Timothy Bishop [D-NY1]
    Jo Bonner [R-AL1]
    Allen Boyd [D-FL2]
    Henry Brown [R-SC1]
    Virginia Brown-Waite [R-FL5]
    Joe Courtney [D-CT2]
    Ander Crenshaw [R-FL4]
    Barney Frank [D-MA4]
    Walter Jones [R-NC3]
    Patrick Kennedy [D-RI1]
    Peter King [R-NY3]
    Frank LoBiondo [R-NJ2]
    Mike McIntyre [D-NC7]
    John Mica [R-FL7]
    Michael Michaud [D-ME2]
    Solomon Ortiz [D-TX27]
    Ileana Ros-Lehtinen [R-FL18]
    Carol Shea-Porter [D-NH1]
    Clifford Stearns [R-FL6]
    John Tierney [D-MA6]
    Rob Wittman [R-VA1]


    Status:
    IntroducedMar 18, 2009Referred to CommitteeView Committee AssignmentsReported by Committee...House Vote...Senate Vote...Signed by President...This bill is in the first step in the legislative process. Introduced bills and resolutions first go to committees that deliberate, investigate, and revise them before they go to general debate. The majority of bills and resolutions never make it out of committee. [Last Updated: Dec 9, 2009 6:19AM]

    Last Action:
    Mar 23, 2009: Referred to the Subcommittee on Insular Affairs, Oceans and Wildlife.Related:
    See the Related Legislation page for other bills related to this one and a list of subject terms that have been applied to this bill. Sometimes the text of one bill or resolution is incorporated into another, and in those cases the original bill or resolution, as it would appear here, would seem to be abandoned.


    http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=h111-1584

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    NJ
    Posts
    12,822

    Default

    All comments welcome.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    NJ
    Posts
    781

    Default

    What is the regular amount of time given for rebuilding overfished fisheries? Do they really need 10 or more years?

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    NJ
    Posts
    927

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by VSdreams View Post
    Do they really need 10 or more years?
    VS, the last time I read an article on this, I remember reading they were using statistics from the early 1900's as the base number we were supposed to restore levels to. Some have argued that because of climate, migration, bait variations, and human population growth, there is no way those levels should ever be compared to the biomass estimates today. Nonetheless, these are the standards that are set. The reason for HR-1584 is to put some flexibility into the 10 year plan. At least with a re-evaluation and the target spread out into more time, the goals are more reachable.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •