Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: A823 Requires DEP to establish free recreational saltwater fishing registry.

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    248

    Exclamation A823 Requires DEP to establish free recreational saltwater fishing registry.

    2nd Reading in the Assembly


    1/12/2010 Introduced, Referred to Assembly Agriculture and Natural Resources Committee

    3/8/2010 Reported out of Assembly Committee, 2nd Reading



    Passed out of Committee for vote in the Assembly.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    531

    Default

    I would assume this is NJ?

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    248

    Default

    Yes.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    NJ
    Posts
    781

    Default

    I can't imagine that this will always be free. Is this for the first year only? What are they thinking of charging us?

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    248

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by VSdreams View Post
    I can't imagine that this will always be free. Is this for the first year only? What are they thinking of charging us?
    Read it here:

    http://www.njleg.state.nj.us/2010/Bi...000/823_T1.HTM


    Also the Committee's statement:

    http://www.njleg.state.nj.us/2010/Bi...000/823_S1.HTM

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    NJ
    Posts
    12,822

    Default From the RFA

    Capt Adam Nowalsky from the Karen Ann II out of LEI was there to testify, among others.Thanks for the updates, NJdiver.


    FREE FISHING REGISTRY LEGISLATION LEAVES COMMITTEE
    A823 EXPECTED TO GET FULL NJ ASSEMBLY VOTE IN 2010



    March 9, 2010 - The New Jersey Assembly Agriculture and Natural Resources Committee unanimously approved Assembly Bill 823 on Monday to create a free saltwater registry in New Jersey. If passed by the full Assembly, the law would mean that coastal anglers in New Jersey would not have to file with a federal registry next year and would also be exempt from having to pay a federal fee starting in 2011.
    Primary sponsors including Assemblymen Nelson Albano and Matt Milam, (D-District 1), along with John Amodeo (R-District 2) and Celeste Riley (D-District 3) all agreed with testimony given by proponents of the free registry legislation that the plan to create a simple state database now would be better than forcing state residents to participate with the federal registry. A823 now goes to the full Assembly for a vote, and also carries the support of co-sponsors including committee member Gilbert "Whip" Wilson (D-District 5), as well as Scott T. Rumana (R-District 40)
    The bill matches identical Senate bill (S1122) introduced last month by Senator Jeff Van Drew (D-1) and would allow the state to set up its own database of saltwater anglers without charging fishermen any license fee. Successful passage of both versions of the free registry bill with the governor's signature would exempt all recreational anglers who fish in New Jersey coastal waters from having to pay NOAA to put their name, contact information and fishing habits on file.
    As mandated by the Magnuson Stevens Act, federal surveyors who keep track of recreational fish harvest will be required to use the saltwater angler registry to contact fishermen about their fishing habits. As of 2010, those fishing in New Jersey coastal waters are required to register with the federal government in an effort to improve data collection (visit www.countmyfish.noaa.gov for details). As of 2011 NOAA has said they may begin charging anglers up to $25 apiece to register online with the federal system, unless states come up with their own system of gathering angler information.
    Chairman Albano opened Monday's hearing by introducing Sen. Van Drew, who told the committee that having a better list of fishermen would improve the way fish stocks were counted. Sen. Van Drew explained that NOAA surveyors currently make random phone calls using coastal phonebooks in order to gather recreational harvest data, "cold calling," as the senator put it. "It's obviously not the most efficient way to go about this," Sen. Van Drew said about the current methods of data collection, adding "so it does make sense to have a good fishing registry."
    Sen. Van Drew noted that by incorporating a free registry program to help keep the contact information of saltwater anglers, he expected New Jersey to maintain a tourism advantage, allowing people to fish off New Jersey for free while other nearby coastal states move to a fee-based license program. "Our tourism budget has been cut," said Van Drew, adding "The reality is every state around us advertises more for tourism."
    "One of the things that we can say is, 'You know what, in New Jersey, when you're with your kids, you can throw your line in the water, and no one's going to come by and say, 'put some money in my hand,'" Van Drew added.
    On hand to testify in favor of A823 yesterday were several members of the Recreational Fishing Alliance (RFA), including RFA-NJ chairman Capt. Adam Nowalsky. "Again, what the government has mandated is a registry, specifically as Sen. Van Drew noted for the purposes of creating a phonebook to be able to have a list of anglers that they can go back to," Nowalsky said.
    The statewide bill's primary opposition in committee came from Tom McCloy, administrator for the state's Bureau of Marine Fisheries, who said that if the state sets up its own registry without charging at least a nominal fee to fund its operation, the cost would ultimately come from the Department of Environmental Protection's budget. McCloy estimated that cost at as much as $2 million annually. McCloy said his estimates were based on an existing contract between the bureau and a third-party vendor that processes hunting and fishing licenses in the state and charges $1.01 per application. That point prompted committee Vice Chair Celeste Riley to ask whether the bureau could design their own simple website to allow fishermen sign-up online.
    "I don't understand why we can't develop some simple, visual basic program that does data collection," added Riley, referencing simple "print screen" functionality for anglers to print out their required proof of registration. "That would be simple enough for what we need," she later told the Atlantic City Press.
    McCloy responded that this is essentially how the current program works, but explained "for the privilege of doing that, again by the current contract, the vendor gets $1.01 for every one of those transactions." McCloy did say he would investigate whether thaor not his department could be exempted from the vendor's charge.
    "Why isn't this something that can be done in-house without a vendor attached," asked Chairman Albano, who questioned why the Division couldn't offer "a quick online registry for someone where this data is stored and then forwarded over to the federal government." McCloy added that this was something that was "out of his area of expertise," though he noted he'd investigate if a free registry could be done outside of the current third-party licensing contract.
    Assemblyman Amodeo described the question of who will pay for the registry's operation as a "tough call," particularly in light of the state's current budget problems, while adding "But I think we have to come together and really make this work so that the people and the tourism industry and the dad that wants to take his son fishing will be able to do it without having to be involved with any type of fee."

    To learn more about the RFA-NJ chapter and to get involved in NJ saltwater fishing issues, visit www.rfanj.org


  7. #7
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    531

    Default

    Hopefully they can get around that vendor issue and make it a reality. Although from what I have read, the governor is not about to sign a bill for a free mandate.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    248

    Default

    The NJ Marine Fisheries Administrator Thomas W. McCloy, was asked by an Assemblyperson to investigate the possibility of using a webpage to collect the data, bypassing the contractor. The existing Recreational Saltwater Angler Survey can serve as an example. I suggested it back in 2008 and was ignored.


    http://www.state.nj.us/dep/fgw/marinesurvey.htm

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    248

    Default

    A823 ammended on Assembly floor 3/15/10:

    [First Reprint]
    ASSEMBLY, No. 823

    STATE OF NEW JERSEY
    214th LEGISLATURE

    PRE-FILED FOR INTRODUCTION IN THE 2010 SESSION


    Sponsored by:
    Assemblyman NELSON T. ALBANO
    District 1 (Cape May, Atlantic and Cumberland)
    Assemblyman MATTHEW W. MILAM
    District 1 (Cape May, Atlantic and Cumberland)
    Assemblyman JOHN F. AMODEO
    District 2 (Atlantic)
    Assemblywoman CELESTE M. RILEY
    District 3 (Salem, Cumberland and Gloucester)

    Co-Sponsored by:
    Assemblymen Rumana and Wilson


    SYNOPSIS
    Requires DEP to establish free recreational saltwater fishing registry.

    CURRENT VERSION OF TEXT
    As amended by the General Assembly on March 15, 2010.



    An Act concerning saltwater fishing, supplementing P.L.1979, c.199 (C.23:2B-1 et seq.), and repealing section 82 of P.L.1979, c.199.

    Be It Enacted by the Senate and General Assembly of the State of New Jersey:

    1. a. The commissioner, in consultation with the Marine Fisheries Council, shall establish and implement a registry program for saltwater recreational anglers, which program shall provide for:
    (1) the registration, including 1the name, date of birth, address, telephone number, and other1 identification and contact information 1determined to be necessary by the department pursuant to federal requirements1, of individuals who engage in recreational fishing:
    (a) in the Exclusive Economic Zone;
    (b) for anadromous species; 1[or]1
    (c) for Continental Shelf fishery resources beyond the Exclusive Economic Zone; 1or
    (d) in the tidal waters of the State;1 and
    (2) the registration, including the ownership, operator, and identification of the vessel, of vessels used in such fishing.
    b. (1) The registry program established pursuant to this section shall comply with the provisions of the registry program to be established pursuant to the “Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Reauthorization Act of 2006,” Pub.L.109-479 (16 U.S.C. s.1801 et seq.).
    (2) Upon establishment of the registry program pursuant to this section, the commissioner shall apply to the National Marine Fisheries Service of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration for exempted state designation from the federal registration requirements.
    c. The department shall not charge a fee for the registration required pursuant to this section.
    1d. A person who is under 16 years of age or a customer fishing from a state-licensed or federally permitted for-hire vessel shall not be required to register pursuant to this section.1

    2. Section 82 of P.L.1979, c.199 (C.23:2B-18) is repealed.

    3. This act shall take effect immediately.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •