Quote Originally Posted by apmaurosr View Post
I’d like to point out that it is the responsibility of those that are involved with the bill to perform due diligence in order for it to be written properly. Again, the NJ Outdoor Alliance (CF) is not responsible for writing the bill. In fact, it is our position that a $2.00 administrative fee is needed to cover the $600,000 in projected costs.

In our opinion a $2.00 administrative fee is a more responsible approach to managing the registry given a weakened Bureau of Marine Fisheries (BMF) and a $10.7 billion budget deficit faced by the state of New Jersey.
I am a little confused here, can you enlighten me?
I read in another thread that there will eventually be a fee of up to $15 for NJ as well. I am not talking about the NOAA fee, I am referring to the possible NJ fee. So why isn't everyone on board with just the $2 fee if that is all that is needed?
Is the NJOA supporting a $2 fee, or a $15 fee, for the long run, and why? Thanks.