Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: bunker to be cut by 37%

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    1,031

    Default bunker to be cut by 37%

    Here are the latest results.




    Baltimore Sun
    The interstate panel that oversees fishing along the Eastern Seaboard voted overwhelmingly Wednesday to cut the menhaden catch by up to 37 percent next year in an effort to protect the species and, by extension, striped bass.
    The 14-3 vote by the Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission was hailed by environmentalists and criticized by commercial fishermen who make their living catching menhaden for processing into animal feed and dietary supplements and for bait.

    Boston Globe:
    After years of pressure from environmental groups and recreational fishermen, a panel that regulates fishing from Maine to Florida decided yesterday in Boston to reduce the catch of menhaden by as much as 37 percent of the number caught last year.

    “What the commission did is akin to swatting a gnat with a sledgehammer,’’ said Ron Lukens, a senior fisheries biologist for Omega. “It’s absolutely a disappointment. We knew we were going to take a cut, but this is a little too much to swallow.’’

    Bangor Daily News:
    At a meeting in Boston, the Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission voted 14-3 to cut the amount of menhaden that can be harvested annually from 183,000 metric tons to 174,000 metric tons. The commission must now draft and vote on a plan to implement the new rule, which is likely to become effective in May 2013, spokeswoman Tina Berger said.

    Washington Post
    At a meeting in Boston, the Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission voted 14-3 to cut the amount of menhaden that can be harvested annually from 183,000 metric tons to 174,000 metric tons.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    1,956

    Default

    If you do the math, it looks like a 5% reduction. That doesn't seem to be significant at all. It looks like another smoke and mirrors job.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    950

    Default

    So really that means no progress?

  4. #4
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Ocean County,NJ
    Posts
    4,619

    Default

    all BS to me final vote in 2012 and if approved as new evidence can be submitted against it, wouldn't go into effect until 2013

    Pay attention to what history has taught us or be prepared to relive it again

  5. #5
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    45

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by hookset View Post
    If you do the math, it looks like a 5% reduction. That doesn't seem to be significant at all. It looks like another smoke and mirrors job.

    It sure reads that way . . .
    Early to bed, early to rise, fish all day, makeup lies.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    NJ
    Posts
    2,439

    Default

    Kill all the bunker. 90% of the surf and boat guy would stop fishing because they don't know how to tie their shoes without a piece of bunker on the hook. Simple solution, bass saved.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    inside a wormhole, Mass.
    Posts
    1,867

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by hookset View Post
    If you do the math, it looks like a 5% reduction. That doesn't seem to be significant at all. It looks like another smoke and mirrors job.
    Yeah, but the guy who started the movement now gets more $$ to fight, and buy a new car with.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Ocean County,NJ
    Posts
    4,619

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jigfreak View Post
    Kill all the bunker. 90% of the surf and boat guy would stop fishing because they don't know how to tie their shoes without a piece of bunker on the hook. Simple solution, bass saved.
    couldn't have said it better watch if they win and tackle shops want $5.00 a bunker how they will cry there are tons of bunker just lest less fish to eat them since the snag and drop pro's have killed most of the breeding stock

    Pay attention to what history has taught us or be prepared to relive it again

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    1,272

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by finchaser View Post
    the snag and drop pro's have killed most of the breeding stock
    It gets me sick to see the carnage that happens in the Spring bunker blitzes. I was once part of that, so I am guilty as well. And in the 70's, I and a lot of my friends killed a lot of striped bass. And the weakfish, we used to catch them from Fortescue in the Delaware bay by the trash can full. We did a lot of damage to the stock back then but did not know any better.
    Now we know better and have a better handle on the fish stocks. Because this is so, we should put the striper before the bunker. The striper generates billions in revenue from the recreational side and supports many local businesses and helps local families. In the 70's Fortescue was known as the weakfish capital of NJ. The economy there and the businesses that benefitted from fishing were booming. Once the weakfish population crashed in the Delaware, that area started to decline.
    These things need to be considered as part of the big picture. For that reason the striper should be the main focus of any committee. Bunker are important, but as was mentioned here, even if you vastly increased the amount of bunker, you would still have less stripers. We need to concentrate on the stripers first.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    1,956

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jigfreak View Post
    kill all the bunker. 90% of the surf and boat guy would stop fishing because they don't know how to tie their shoes without a piece of bunker on the hook. Simple solution, bass saved.

    amen!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •