Page 5 of 5 FirstFirst ... 345
Results 81 to 90 of 90

Thread: NJ Beach replenishment - Pics/Videos before and after

  1. #81
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Central Jersey
    Posts
    2,087

    Default

    Well said seamonkey. I feel the same way. They are like the 800lb gorilla that does whatever it wants to. They have no accountability. I wonder how our citizens would react if they lived under a gov't where the police and elected officials had no accountability and could do whatever they wanted. Sure we have problems with our police and govt now, from corruption to harassment. Still there is a responsibility to stay within the law and the ones that don't are eventually brought to justice. The ACOE has not been held to simple standards. Even something as simple as environmental impact statement, which every large wetlands developer has been subject to, is not even on the table for the ACOE. They do seem untouchable and it is very frustrating.

  2. #82
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    1,956

    Default

    Check out the latest casualty of beach replenishment

    Swimmer pulled from ocean in Sea Bright dies
    http://www.app.com/story/news/crime/...dies/31463033/

  3. #83
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    248

    Default

    Army Corps of Engineers New York District's Biological Monitoring Program for the Atlantic Coast of New Jersey, Sea Bright to Manasquan Inlet, Beach Erosion Project

    The report describes results of during-construction (1997) and first- and second-year post-construction (1998, 1999, & 2000) studies as well as comparisons with the pre-construction
    results (1994-1996).


    http://www.nan.usace.army.mil/Missio...ngProgram.aspx

  4. #84
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    NJ
    Posts
    861

    Default

    Thanks for sharing that.
    I found this paragraph-

    Potential impacts to the fish community from the beach nourishment project could
    occur through several processes. The placement of sand on the beach buries, at least temporarily, existing benthic habitat, which may reduce the availability of infauna to benthic feeders. The burial of the groins may reduce the value of these structures as foraging and shelter sites.

    Additionally, the physical disturbance caused by dredging and

    the pumping of sand onto the beach may also affect fish distribution patterns.
    Elevated
    turbidity can negatively affect the physiology and feeding behavior of some fishes (reviewed in LaSalle et al. 1991, Wilber and Clarke submitted) and presumably could make areas of shoreline that are being nourished unsuitable for some surf zone
    inhabitants.


    Duh! Pretty obvious isn't it?

  5. #85
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    NJ
    Posts
    3,962

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by lostatsea View Post
    Thanks for sharing that.
    I found this paragraph-

    Potential impacts to the fish community from the beach nourishment project could
    occur through several processes. The placement of sand on the beach buries, at least temporarily, existing benthic habitat, which may reduce the availability of infauna to benthic feeders. The burial of the groins may reduce the value of these structures as foraging and shelter sites.

    Additionally, the physical disturbance caused by dredging and



    the pumping of sand onto the beach may also affect fish distribution patterns.
    Elevated
    turbidity can negatively affect the physiology and feeding behavior of some fishes (reviewed in LaSalle et al. 1991, Wilber and Clarke submitted) and presumably could make areas of shoreline that are being nourished unsuitable for some surf zone
    inhabitants.


    Duh! Pretty obvious isn't it?
    Absolute f'cken morons.
    Is the nicest thing I can say for anyone who had anything to do with pushing the beach replenishment agenda.
    White Water Monty 2.00 (WWM)
    Future Long Islander (ASAP)

  6. #86
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    NJ
    Posts
    12,822

    Default

    Here's an oldie for ya, Monty....
    Bay head beach, circa 2005 after Hurricane Wilma
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails OS Bayhead 10-28-05 hurricane Wilma .jpg  

  7. #87
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    950

    Default

    Check out this company rcaerialpro.com
    They do everything. Awesome before and after storm pics as well.
    http://www.rcaerialpro.com/winter-storm-jonas-erosion/#

  8. #88
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    inside a wormhole, Mass.
    Posts
    1,867

    Default

    Seems like it's all about political patronage. Don't know jersey, though it does appear to be a waste of money.

  9. #89
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    NJ
    Posts
    2,439

    Default

    Def a waste. Many of the jetties are no longer covered with sand.

  10. #90
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Central Jersey
    Posts
    2,087

    Default

    They are working on Belmar again. This is a multimillion dollar farce, never ending.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails 11-28-17.jpg  

Page 5 of 5 FirstFirst ... 345

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •